Wednesday, October 6, 2010

If You're a Woman...


...I wouldn't recommend sticking Glenn Beck's bristly, addled head between your legs, no matter how big of a sweaty douchebag he is, no matter how much his head might remind you of an ambitious French tickler. Use a real douchebag and accept no substitutes. Yes, yes, it's true that Glenn Beck is at the end of virtually every day a bag o' douche but it's never advisable to literally interpret ad hominems like the kind I am about to aim at Beck and the enormous, unpopped zit on his fat ass that goes by the name of Pat Gray.

What I'm talking about is the Obion County Fire Department refusing to put out Gene Cranick's house because he forgot to pay a $75 fee that should've been guaranteed through his property and income taxes. Cranick lost his house and everything in it, including three dogs and a cat, while the fire department watched it burn (it didn't stop them from bringing out the men and engines, however and one is left to wonder why they didn't bring hot dogs and marshmallows).

Cranick offered to pay the fee on the spot to save his house, which is pathetic enough as it is, but the fire chief, who could've but didn't grant a dispensation, basically told him, "It's not our department."


Well, Glenn Beck and his cackling, unpopped zit think this is funny.

Josh Holland had this covered and unpacked pretty well on Alternet two and a half days ago but I think a few things ought to be mentioned. Holland is absolutely correct in widening the gyre so to speak by macrosizing this synecdochal incident into a damning and blistering indictment on the inherent evils of Randian dystopianism.

He also gives a few examples culled from all over the country of social services such as police, student aid and Medicare being pulled out from under the feet of hard-working people because of Republican buttfuckery. The most stunning example is the case of Ashtabula County, Ohio, which thanks to Republican budget cuts, reduced the number of county Sheriff's deputies by more than 50%, thereby allowing convicted violent offenders to loiter on the streets while awaiting their turn to be imprisoned. Simply put, that means there are more bad guys and less police officers on the streets there and judges are now warning county residents to "arm themselves."

This is Ayn Rand's and the GOP's vision: all governments on all levels shrunk and underfunded to the point of irrelevance and providing in return for taxes less in the way of goods and services. It has now gotten to the point where, if you live in Obion County, TN, the county fire department will watch your house burn down if you didn't pay your $75 bribe. Not only that, there's a very real chance if you live next door, your house will burn down, too, even if you paid your $75, as was the case with Cranick's next door neighbor.

And the likes of Glenn Beck think that's funny.

Hardly a word had been raised about the state and county deliberately underfunding the fire dept. even though they cut off their noses to spite their face. Says Holland,
But last December, a county commission on which every member is a Republican voted to rescind a resolution passed years earlier that would have established a countywide fire department. Their rationale was, of course, the need to keep taxes low, but according to the county commission report, that decision was penny wise but pound foolish. “Because there is no operational county fire department,” the officials noted, “Obion County has missed the opportunity to actively pursue receipt of FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) and Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), which could amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars of funding.”

Paying the $75 is euphemistically called a "subscription." A subscription is getting the NY Times or The Nation sent to your home. What this essentially comes out to is a bribe that takes us all the way back to the stupendously corrupt and mercenary fire departments of Boss Tweed's New York City of the 1860's.

Last year in July, when writing about health care, Tina Dupuy set the record straight on the Huff Po when she gave us one (now prescient) example that had already occurred to me: The evils of private enterprise and how it rarely if ever reaches the level of proficiency as a government-funded entity. I'd already thought of the 19th century NYC fire department:
Let's look at this reasonably: Firefighting used to be a private for-profit industry. In the 1800's, the early days of urbanization, in cities like New York and Baltimore, there were private "clubs" or "gangs" who were in charge of putting out fires. The infamous Boss Tweed started his illustrious political career at a volunteer fire company. The way it functioned was the first club at the scene got money from the insurance company. So, they had an incentive to get there fast. They also had an incentive to sabotage competition. They also often ended up getting in fights over territory and many times buildings would burn down before the issue was resolved. They were glorified looters. It was corrupt, bloated and expensive -- but at least it wasn't the much maligned "government controlled."

The police department under Tweed and the corrupt mayors of New York was hardly any better. If one must aspire to any intellectual muscularity and fitness, then one must then ask the inevitable question no matter how fearful the probable answer: What next? Where will it end?

Will the same thing happen to local police departments and county Sheriff's offices? Will they or or will not take a statement and investigate your assault, loved one's murder, your mother's or sister's rape, your child's abduction based on whether or not you paid your "police subscription" (your more uncharitable liberals may call it "protection money")?

We're halfway there already.

Every year, many of you, I'm sure, get calls from your local PD or Benevolent Association asking for a donation. In reward for your donation, they'll send to your house a shiny decal to put on your rear windshield. No cop will ever admit to it but here's the way it works in Ayn Rand's dystopian Amerika: It's always the second thing they notice, after your license plate. If you have the shiny silver sticker conspicuously glinting from your rear window that proves you already paid above your fair share of taxes that funds the PD, your chances of getting off with a warning dramatically increase. And it may even determine the energy level behind the investigation when you're the victim. And don't think the local constabulary doesn't make note of who pays and doesn't pay. They're the police: It's their job to kick ass and take names and not necessarily in that order.

But according to douchebags like Glenn Beck and that unpopped anyl cyst of his that was affectionately named Pat Gray, guys like Gene Cranick and not the Republican douchebags who blocked the formation of a countywide fire department are the real bad guys, the ones who "hurt the fire department" by not paying their "subscription" in a timely fashion. A $200,000, $300,000, $400,000 house and the memories, possessions and living creatures lost forever within are suddenly worth less than a $75 "subscription" that no one in America should ever have to pay.

And you will be subject to ridicule just to champion a morally and intellectually bankrupt Randian ideology that has been proven time and again over the centuries to be ruinous and guaranteed of failure.

And this is what the Republican Party will bring about if they take back even one chamber of Congress next month. And with the Tea Baggers calling the shots and giving the establishment GOP their marching orders, you'll see and hear about a lot more homes burning down and people getting killed and thrown off Medicare and children dying because their CHIP funding got taken from them.


Then, you really will be missing the palmier, more humane days of George W. Bush.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Glenn Beck Wins Nobel Prize for Literature


Just one year after Barack Obama improbably won the Nobel Peace prize after just six weeks in office, the Prize Committee has just announced that Glenn Beck will receive the Nobel Prize for Literature.

Beck’s highly-praised book, The Overton Window, is considered to be largely instrumental to the conservative Fox News pundit winning literature’s richest and most prestigious prize. But the panel, hastily assembled after all the former judges met with grisly but accidental deaths, cited Beck’s other works, including, A Man, a Blackboard and a Liberal Conspiracy, Why I Cry Like a Colicy Baby for America and Goldfinger 2.

"Mr. Beck's ouvre ton coeur," said judge Tim LaHaye of the Left Behind series, "contains more than a liberal, if you'll pardon the expression, admixture of conservatism, paranoia and hypervigilance of reverse racism. But perhaps I'm being tautological."

The Overton Window was co-written by young, up-and-coming authors Kevin Balfe, Emily Bestler, and Jack Henderson who'd received no more mention from the judging panel than they did on the cover of the Simon & Schuster blockbuster. It's hard to see why, since all three authors combined have published four books of their own, including The Murderer Who Killed, Do Me Again, You Nasty Sailor Boy and Barack Obama and the Koran: How the 44th President Was Predicted in the Muslim Heathen Holy Book.

"The Overton Window," said Sean Hannity, also on the Nobel judging panel, "is a heart-rending but unflinching look at the liberal agenda that is nonetheless defeated time and again by a shrinking, ideologically malnourished Republican minority in Congress." But not all the reviews to the book have been kind. Kirkus Reviews wrote last June, "Glenn Beck's ghostwritten book, The Overton Window, is a ghastly, adolescent primordial ooze of letters and punctuation marks intermittently shot through with literacy."

"If the judging panel had given it to anyone else, I would've killed them with a baseball bat," said fellow New York Times bestselling author Ann Coulter.


Beck joins a long list of other American literary legends who have won the prize, including Ernest Hemingway, Pearl S. Buck and John Steinbeck. Beck will be the first American Nobel literature laureate who still cannot spell the word "oligarch" and writes all his books on mp3 wireless recorders and colored chalk.

Beck will receive his prize not in Stockholm as per tradition but in Goldline's corporate headquarters in Santa Monica, California. When reached at his glassed-in, bulletproof office at Fox News, Beck was asked if he would sink his new fortune into Goldline gold coins.

Beck still has not stopped laughing.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Ask the Yahoos


There are a million reasons for opposing gay marriage and every single one of them fall like dominos when presented with facts and logic. Still, that doesn’t prevent certain people from clinging to their moth-eaten beliefs as to why gay marriage shouldn’t exist. Ask America’s survey asked Yahoo users if they were for or against gay marriage (at this time, 54% are in favor, 46% against). What follows below is actual feedback posted within the space of just one hour that I’d lifted from the comment section on, appropriately, the right side of the page. (I get the feeling that many of these people who weighed in with these comments were also carrying around misspelled signs at Glenn Beck’s rally.)

It’s Just Wrong But I Won’t Go Into Detail Why.

(This faction tantalizingly gives us sort of a reason why homosexuality is wrong without actually offering a cogent argument as to why. One gets the impression, however, that these people are just one epileptic seizure away from claiming that if God had His way, gay men would be born without penises or assholes.)

no its against evary thing thats moral deasent and correct

I believe Gay marriage is also an abomination. Being Gay is a sin and allowing it in our society is condoning sin. Jesus asks us to fight against sin and not give in to it if we want to be saved!

Where do Homos, stand on "Perversion" ? Or does the word even exist in their vocabulary?

God will have the final say in this matter. It's not normal, not Biblical, and impossible to engage in homosexuality and be a christian. Read the Holy Bible to know the real truth.

Its just wrong, thats why it should not be entertained no where in this world. Do you teach you kids from baby growing up that its ok to for a boy to kiss a boy or a girl to kiss a girl - NO!

being gay is not a sin acting on those desires is the sin, just as adultery is a sin. we do not say go chaet on your spouse. If we accept Gay marriage we accept or say sin is ok. We have got to stand

It is an aberrant behavior. Why should it be legalized?

Homosexuality is an abomination to our Creator and will not go unpunished. It is against all biblical precepts. Remember the punishment of Sodom and Gomorrah by Jehovah?

Marriage is meant to be between a MAN and a WOMAN!! not both female both male: humans are a species, and you dont see dogs being gay, or cats or any other animal, homosexulaity is wrong in any species

Gay marriage is wrong because of its roots. The only reason we have gay marriage is because homosexuals want it. I don't hate people, but homosexuality is wrong. Stop being perverse before God!

Forget being "politically correct" or "the right thing to do"...I am against gay marriage, in fact, I am completly against gays. It wasn't meant to be, God didn't design it that way nor does he accept

But… But Think of the Children!

(Because we all know marriage is just about dutifully having sex and beating the chinks, Muslims and Indians at baby-making.)

In the Book of Genisis God said the man is not without the woman or the woman without the man. They were one flesh and commanded to multiply and replenish the earth. God, himself, married them.

Marriage is about creating children, period. Figure it out

I voted no, not because I think that a certain gay or lesbian couple can't raise fine kids or have equality via the Constitution, but because the definition of marriage is between a male and a female.

If this goes through on the basis of everyone has the right to choose whom they are with, will it be okay for a father to marry his daughter? A mother her son? Cousin to cousin? It WILL pave the way!

if gay marriage is legalized then it'll be forced upon those who oppose it to accept, taught 2 r children, and any speech against it would be "hate speech" i.e. Canada. That's not right.

Love who you want to love, but the institution of marriage was not based on love. It was based on procreation and preserving families. That's why married couples get tax breaks.

From my point of view homosexuality is total wrong hence same sex marriage is too. i dont want my children growing it these condition thinking that it is all right when itz not.

Man and woman are meant to be together to build the family unit. Anything else is tearing down the family. The family and the union between Man and Woman should continue to be sacred!

Is it acceptable for a club to be formed that give grown men the right to have SEXUAL ACTS WITH LITTLE BOYS! NO & neither should the gay/lesbian SEXUAL ACTS ever be accepted, it is not normal behavior

But…But Think of the Dogs!

(Looks like Rick Santorum had a busy day today.)

My dog love me- can i marry him ?

Next, we will wanting to have sex with our animals and marry them.

This is a great deviation from what life was meant to be soon we will start debating should man marry a dog, trying to legalize have sex with dogs.that is the height of deterioration in our world 2day

I think if you start granting special rights to people based only upon alternate/perverse sexual lifestyles, you open the door for other more outrageous demands for special rights.

(Like what, for instance?)

marriage has always been defined as a union of man and woman. It has always been based on that.What is next? Inanimate objects? Plants? DVD's?

If two same sex dogs hung out together just for "freaky" sex, no prob! They can't reproduce! But gay couples are now "gathering" children by any means they can think up! Adoption, surrigate, or ???

I Have Nothing Against These Filthy Degenerates But…

(Let’s just get that pesky appearance of intolerance out of the way right now so we can get back to the intolerance.)

Let me begin by saying that I am NOT a racist. However, this issue is only a big deal because white liberals made it an issue. I don't agree with gay marriage because it's not ordained by God.

I am not racist but I do believe in what my bible says. I will not bring my children up to believe that this is normal. It is unfortunate for those that feel they are gay/lesbian. Strictly MY opinion

I have no problem with gays.... I however DONT feel comfortable, or feel it is right to for Gays to get married. My little sister is a lesbian and I told her that though I love her,.... I dont agree.

I hate it when people say that because I am a christian that says I don't support gay marriage that I am being judgemental. Look folks, I didn't say I hate gay people! I am just against them marrying

I have NO ROMBLEM with gay people, I have family members that are gay.BUT I think is should be just that I AM GAY and proud of it ,NOT I am gay I wanna marry the same sex it just doesn't fit.

Don't call Christians hateful for standing up for their beliefs. Our God told us that we should not tolerate sin. He also told us that homosexuality is a sin. It's not about hate, it's about obedience

Some Dead Hebrews Whose Existence Has Yet to be Proven Said it, I Believe it, That Settles It!

(These people obviously would prefer to let dead people from an irrelevant point in history think for them.)

In the beginning, God created male and female. If same-sex marriage was a natural thing, God would have created us that way. Homosexuality is not just a sin, but an Abomination.

In the Bible, God said homosexual relationships are wrong period! Who is smarter than God????????

I vote no because God made the woman and man to be together not a man and man or woman and woman God does not like that so please think before you do something like that God will help you.

Its against my Christian religion. there ya go

Whether you are believe in God or believe in evolution, it goes against both. God says it's wrong. Evolution would show it's wrong. You can't advance a species by being gay. You'd get no where.

Next they will legalize, porn is okay to be viewed by children and allow children to be in them, because of preference??? NO NO NO.....

can't leave God out of this (no matter how hard you try or cry out in disdain everytime you see His name) He is our Creator and substainer of ALL life. He created order and man proceeds to disrupt it.

Chapped and Averse

(These good souls know the chapter and verse of the two brief passages in the Bible that agrees with them about hating the gays and whatever else in the Bible that can be tortured into being tangentially related.)

In the Bible, book of Romans chapter 1 V. 18-32, very plane of God's law about, homoGod gave them up umto vile affections for even there women did change the natural use into that which is against NAT

If a mam lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. Leviticus20:22a NIV Marriage was made to be between a man and a woman. Kids need what mom and dad bring.

Having the same rights as a married couple us "BS" excuse to demoralize this nation even further. People should learn from history. Who knows we may all turn into a piller of salt.

God created Adam & Eve to become one not Adam & Earl!

God did not say Eve go get married to a woman and multiply, or Adam go find Steve and multiply. He said it to man and woman. You that is why we have the organs that we have.

God created Adam and Eve..He hates homosexuality and of course the bible tells how Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed because of "men with men"

Those Who Cannot Spell or Punctuate Do Not Get to Establish or Reestablish Etymology For Anything.

(In fact, let’s just ban them from all writing implements by an Act of Congress.)

Marriage is and should be between a man and a woman. This is what is natural - and traditional in this country. We are losing our culture to this liberal agenda. I want my country back!!

If two dudes want to live their life in sin, call it something else and don't start pushing it into our schools. I don't think it's right. Marrige is for a man & a woman. Can they create a child?

man and woman were created to be together. we are each other's puzzle pieces. where as to men and men and women and women are like putting the wrong piece into a puzzle. IT DOESN'T FIT!

The deffinition of marriage has been between a man and a woman for 1000's of years and now were trying to redefine it. I don't think so. To support the population a man and a woman are required.

To redefine marriage means reducating our youth in school about relatinships between same sex couples. I have taught my children that it is not what marriage is about. Men & Men does not life make.

Marriage for a man and a woman. Civil union is OK without right to raise kids, because it promotes homosexuality, look at France. They are too noisy with their demands, what is pretty annoying.

I respect a couple's right to be a couple, but marriage has been set aside for millenia as between a man & woman. It is best for our country to leave it be. I would hate to see what's next? Polyagamy

Where Reason and Logic Fail…

(…always trust the ideological tar brush.)

Are u gays & lesbose proud of your selves,becouse i think u r discusting & sick .

just another nail in the coffin of the moral degradation of society

use another term for this abnormal union if you wish to legitimize sexual deviants...

I think we all should have a say in this because when all the gays get married and start coming down with aids and other such diseases, guess who's going to pay for that? Us. the tax payers.

Gay people just want attention. Why do u have to be married to profess ur love?! you don't. How many men and women live together with out being married?! ALOT.

WTF…?!

(Or, in the words of Buddha, “What the fuck?!”)

I voted NO because I don't believe the same sex intimate relationships were meant to be. If an individual wants a same sex partner they need to keep it in the "Closet".

Marriage isn't a right, not even for normal people. That's the first mistake. Changing law and culture over how 2% of the population want to please themselves is the second mistake.

gotta love the gay agenda. Less than 5% of the population, but they've pulled the wool over 45% of america. "Hey, it's normal." "Hey, we're a minority." they love using buzzwords to get a response.

well at least i dont have to worry about gays when i die because thay wont make it thru the gates of heaven

why is this a topic for the goverment? I think that Men and women should marry. If u let gays marry. Then why cant men have two wives, Social order people!

Hey gays: you NEED heterosexuals. You can't survive without them. There's no survival of your species without us. So how's about you say "thank you" by leaving our institution alone?

People can be gay if they want. In the same way people can smoke crack if they so choose. I believe both are sins so I will not endorse either one. I'm not judging their hearts, just their actions.

It is a sin! A union between 2 people of the same sex is not sacred. IS IT Worth BURNING FOR ETERNITY. You people that don‘t believe in God want know until death. Then it’s to late!.

micheal...it's not the hetero people that im saying are right...it's a God..who I would rather trust than the gays

Why is it so hard to understand that males and females are made differently,in fact that's how God set it up.These acts are the sickness of the mind.Let the bible have the final say.

If someone wants to be gay go right ahead but you don't have the right to change the definition of marriage for all people!!

Every culture that has promoted homosexual practices as normal and healthy has collapsed from within. Homosexual marriage is one of the first steps in destroying religion and the nuclear family.

CP: If that's true, then why not just let them marry each other? To shut 'em up

Yes, Jesus loves all people, but HE does not love our sins, HE died on a cross for all who will believe in HIM and repent of thier sins........Homosexuality is a sin

it is not ok to be homosexual, if you look at majority of these relationships 1 partner takes the role of the man & the other as the woman, why is that? it is because it is natural instincts at work

So what, we can tax and demonize smokers and tell them that they can't suck on tobacco because it is disgusting but we as a society can't condemn foul sexuality? Both have bad diseases associated....

(Occasionally, some liberal asshole sneaks one in on the right side, such as me, for instance…)

So, Elton John and George Takei are to blame for Ted Haggard's and Eddie Long's secret forays into gay sex or Vitter's or Ensign's extramarital affairs? Puh-leeze.

Doing Our Best to Keep Fear Sane.


"Oh, shit, JP's going." "There goes the neighborhood..."

Mrs. JP and I decided that, while it would have been cheaper to take one of Arianna's buses all the way to Assclown Central (aka Washington, DC) to the Stewart/Colbert rallies, ultimately we'd prefer to take our new car and to drive back at our leisure. We'd briefly thought about inviting people to go down with us but we'll be spending the 29th and 30th at a friend's house in Arlington then head back up on Halloween, stopping in Mrs. JP's old haunts in Cranston, Rhode Island. Shame. It would've been cool if someone came along to help with the driving and gas money. However, if anyone in the Massachusetts/Connecticut/Jersey area (Jill?) wanted to hook up en route and form a little caravan, we'd certainly be open to the idea.

So if anyone reading this is going to the Sanity/Fear rallies on October 30th, leave a comment or email us at crawman2@yahoo.com and let us know where you want to meet. We can even exchange cell phone numbers and meet on the mall if not on the road. Seize yaaaaaaaa!

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Assclowns of the Week Midterms, #(19)84: Midterm Madness edition








¡Hola, amigos! Just when you thought things couldn’t get more bizarre on the seedy right side of the tracks, Sarah “I Said No to Phonics” Palin, Tea Partiers and the Republicans who love them shove our addled heads deeper into the rabbit hole of human lunacy. And really, folks, what did America truly need more than Karl Rove in a red dress?

There was a time when we all thought George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the PNAC lunatics who loped across Capitol Hill like the upholstered jackals they are represented the worst that humanity had to offer. But then we elected an African American as our President and suddenly America regressed into an antebellum melodrama as written by George Orwell.

Now, successful and promising Republican campaigns are being waged not only against Democratic incumbents who apparently have never once thought to respond with competence, compassion, common sense and civility toward their base but also mainstream Republicans judged to be not cruel and heartless enough. So your porcine powerhouse thought it was high time he did a special election edition of some of the most notable psychopaths currently running for public office during the midterms. So hop aboard the Tea Party bandwagon and review some of the conservative darlings who will replace some Democrats and much, much more!

10) Scott “Dr. D” DesJarlais


As with so many other Republican/Tea Party candidates, Dr. Scott DesJarlais (TN-4) would at least promise to make Congress more exciting than the snoozefest it usually is on CSPAN. A couple of weeks ago, this is what Roll Call had dug up:
In a motion filed in November 2000, Susan DesJarlais sought to obtain sole possession of the couple’s home and claimed she was forced to leave the residence when her husband’s behavior “became violent and threatening.”

In that document, Susan DesJarlais accused her former husband of “dry firing a gun outside the Plaintiff’s locked bedroom door, admission of suicidal ideation, holding a gun in his mouth for three hours, an incident of physical intimidation at the hospital; and previous threatening behavior ... i.e. shoving, tripping, pushing down, etc.”

In another court document from February 2001, Susan DesJarlais asked that her husband’s visitation rights with their child be limited after he allegedly showed up at her apartment complex on Valentine’s Day and began harassing her to the point that she called the police.

That’s not the same family pictured above and on his official campaign website because Scottie’s since remarried and respawned. The bottom of the page reads, “Scott is Pro-Life, Pro-Gun, Pro-Marriage and proud of it!”

I guess so!

9) Pat Toomey


What follows below is a video unearthed by Democrats of Senate candidate and economic killer clown Pat Toomey when he was a US congressman and publicly calling for more deregulation of the banking industry that the repeal of Glass-Steagall brought about. Of course, the repeal of Glass-Steagall is one of the major reasons for the meltdown that started 7 years later when the housing bubble burst, inspiring a frenzied taxpayer bailout that will eventually cost the US taxpayer $11 trillion.



Since then, according to the Philadelphia Enquirer, Joe Sestak rival Toomey has seen the light and since his epiphany “Republican Senate candidate Pat Toomey has tried to distance himself from derivatives, which he once traded…”

Which, I’m absolutely convinced, is proof that Republicans do have a conscience and can feel remorse, right? Right???

8) David Rivera


Former Marco Rubio roommate David Rivera’s campaign website lists a biography that’s typical of a Republican. What’s missing is this infinitely fascinating biographical tidbit:
In August, CBS4’s investigative team reported on a 2002 incident where Rivera allegedly drove a truck off the road that contained mailers produced by his opponent. Rivera’s version of the story, told to CBS4, did not match up with the incident report or the truck driver’s and printing company’s stories. [CBS4, 8/17/10]

Days later, the Miami Herald reported on allegations – and a court record – that Rivera was accused of domestic violence in 1994. The Herald noted “inconsistencies” in Rivera’s responses to the allegations. While Rivera said he never met the woman, others said they saw the two together and the woman’s mother once worked on one of Rivera’s campaigns. The allegations were the subject of the mailers Rivera tried to stop from being mailed to voters. [Miami Herald, 8/19/10]

Even after Rivera tried to ram a box truck off the highway, he still won the election and is still in the Florida House of Representatives and even chairs the House Appropriations Committee.

Now he wants to get into Congress. Maybe, with his driving record, he’ll be able to get rid of that Congressional gridlock.

7) Jan Brewer


Bleach-blonde Crypt Keeper Jan Brewer, aka the Accidental Governor, made headlines all over the world earlier this year when she’d signed into law Arizona’s SB 1070, the bill that made fascism cool for conservatives again. She made headlines again with a brain fart during a debate with state Attorney General Terry Goddard that would’ve done George W. Bush and Jeanine Pirro sputter with envy.

But that wasn’t half as bizarre as Brewer claiming that decapitated bodies of Mexicans were littering the desert, a baseless assertion on which she’d had another brain fart right after the debate, then doubled down before finally being forced to admit wasn’t true.

When one thinks of former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano’s elevation to Chief of Homeland Security, one gets the suspicion that President Obama didn’t think this thing through clearly.

6) Rand Paul


Ophthalmologist Rand Paul joins a growing list of anti-ObamaCare Republican doctors who are trying to flock to Capitol Hill like tee time at Augusta on a Wednesday. Another darling of the Tea Baggers, Paul made headlines before the spiked punch at his GOP primary victory party was even pissed out when he suggested to Rachel Maddow that he would repeal parts of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Then he pissed off progressives again by coming out in favor of mountain top removal. Not long after that, Paul’s campaign did the inevitable thing: Made him inaccessible to the press.

Oh, yeah, and he also doesn't feel that federal fiscal restraint ought to extend into the megabucks he gets from the Medicare program.

5) Joe Miller


Sporting a thin beard in vogue 75 years ago with Emmett Kelly and railroad hobos, attorney Joe Miller had launched a Quixotic yet successful primary campaign that ousted incumbent Alaskan GOP Senator Lisa Murkowski. This forced her pull a Lieberman, thereby turning Alaska’s Senate race into America’s most unwholesome threesome since OJ, Nicole and Ron Goldman.

Miller’s credentials for succeeding in the senate even an oil rig tool like Murkowski are even thinner than his beard. Miller has gone on record as saying that not only would he try to repeal Social Security and Medicare, but that both federal entitlement programs are unconstitutional. He also thinks that Alaska, which had benefited over the decades from countless tens of billions in federal earmarks thanks to Murkowski, the late Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young, should wean itself off federal money.

He also thinks that global warming is just a coincidence that has nothing to do with the tens of billions of barrels of oil that’s been pumped from Alaska primarily from the North Slope in the past 100+ years.

4) Tom Ganley


“I don’t get no pussy, no pussy at all!”

Maybe failed Ohio Senate contender and failing Congressional contender Tom Ganley should try running for public office in a district not numbered 13. Or maybe he could just stop groping women.

Until last month, the highlight of Ganley’s campaign was in funding a mailer from the Medina County GOP that suggested of his opponent, “Let's take Betty Sutton out of the House and send her back to the kitchen."

But then a few days ago the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that Ganley was being sued by his own customer, employee and campaign volunteer for sexually assaulting her. Says the article, drawing directly from the complaint,
Ganley talked during the meetings about fixing her van for free, reducing her interest rate and giving her a job at a dealership, according to the suit.

In their second meeting, Ganley told the woman that he and his wife lead separate lives and live on opposite sides of their home, the suit says. In each of the meetings, the suit says, Ganley pressed her about what she does for "fun."

On her last visit to Ganley's office, Aug. 1, the woman said she dropped off her van for repairs. While she waited in Ganley's office, the suit says, he made sexually suggestive comments and invited her to join him and his friends at a condominium he owns in Strongsville. Ganley gave her a $100 bill and told her to buy some lingerie and high-heeled shoes, according to the lawsuit.

Ganley told her he wanted her to dominate her, parade her on a leash and have sex with her in front of his "play friends," the suit says. It accuses him of grabbing her from behind, wrapping his arms around her, kissing her and, despite her resistance, reaching into her pants.

The article then sums up Ganley thusly: “The 68-year-old Ganley has been married to his wife Lois, whom he met in elementary school, for 45 years and has four children and eight grandchildren, according to his campaign website.”

So this fat, GOP misogynist, who’s worth as much as $214 million, thinks it’s a good campaign strategy by fondling one of his employees, campaign volunteers and customers by asking her to be led around on a leash. And you all thought Karl Rove had his hands full grooming George W. Bush for office.

3) Sharron Angle


Watch Fox and give me money or my supporters will shoot you.

As with George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, John McCain, Rand Paul and so many other Republicans of late, Nevada’s Sharron Angle and/or her campaign is stiff-arming the evil lib’rul media that has the audacity to document their verbal idiocies. She made that plain when she admitted she goes on Fox “News” only when she needs money (Fox, amazingly, seems willing to be used as a cash cow for Harry Reid’s Republican challenger. I know, I was shocked, too.).



Angle is another of those Tea Bag Ladies that seems immune to any scrutiny let alone criticism from the gun-clutching Far Right no matter how stupid or misinformed her comments. Otherwise, how else can we explain the Angler giving Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid the fight of his life?

2) Christine O’Donnell


Does anyone else think it’s ironic that masturbation foe Christine O’Donnell, the GOP challenger for Joe Biden’s senate seat in Delaware, can appeal to so many Tea Bagger jerkoffs?

Some time in the fall of 2008, America had finally gotten in touch with its inner adolescent boy and cultivated a fascination with helium-headed cheerleader politicians and wouldbes. It all started with Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (R-Stepford), who had helped produce the biggest bumper crop of female political losers and Christine O’Donnell makes Geraldine Ferraro or Hillary Clinton look like Bella Abzug, Eleanor Roosevelt and Barbara Jordan all rolled into one. Gravitas? Competence? Who needs that when we can have Sally Field wrapped in Old Glory and clutching a cross?

And no doubt the witch-fearing Palin is wishing she’d vetted O’Donnell better than McCain had vetted her two years ago since it’s been known for 11 years that O’Donnell “dabbled in witchcraft” and would’ve become a Buddhist if it wasn’t for her unwillingness to give up red meat. She’s lied about her resume… several times. She’s lied about her education… several times. And a candidate who claims having made just $5800 since 2008 has been found to be using $20,000 in campaign contributions for living expenses.


Still, since she had won the coveted “R” seal of conservative approval, the day after Election night, the formerly contemptuous Karl Rove and John Cornyn were forced to backpedal like Chinese high wire acrobats on crystal meth and lavish her with retroactive praise and money.


O’Donnell seems to have little appeal outside of the 30,000 people who voted for her in the Delaware GOP senate primary but the same could be said for Queen Pinhead before John McCain imported her to the mainland like oil-impregnated salmon. While O’Donnell has none of Palin’s viciousness and cunning, calculated mercilessness, the last thing post-election America needs is Palin v.1.0.1 .

But, just to let you all know that not everyone on this list is a political contender, I give you…

1) Rick Sanchez


It’ s not very often that a public figure like Rick Sanchez so thoroughly implodes his career with the meticulous care and planning of a World Trade Center demolition expert. After all, despite their indelicacies, Don Imus, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and other media figures remain employed after, at most, a brief sabbatical.

Rick Sanchez is something else altogether. During an interview with Pete Dominick, CNN’s Sanchez went after the Comedy Channel’s Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert for being “bigoted”, “uninformed” and for having an anti-Latino bias (Badly timed, considering what Mr. Colbert had just done for Hispanic migrant workers in Congress.).

But then Sanchez, in perhaps the ultimate mutually inclusive alienation of all time, also went on a bigoted, uninformed and anti-Semitic rant by claiming his soon-to-be former employer and all the media was run by Jews.

Let’s set aside the fact that Sanchez lost control of the wheel and veered and crashed into Tuckerville by accusing comedian Stewart for being “uninformed”: (a failing that, ironically, hasn’t spread to his viewers). It’s worthier of comment that Sanchez tap-danced on one of journalism’s few third rails by going all Billy Graham on satellite radio and making the Jews his Chosen People.

Next to me, Rick Sanchez is now the most unemployable man in America because, in the space of a few sentences, Sanchez managed to piss off both the Fox and MSNBC demographics and virtually everyone in between and immediately implode his career neatly in its own footprint.

Dishonorable Mention: Dr. Dan Benishek says on his campaign website:
From conception to natural death, all human life is sacred and must be protected. The inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are always relevant and should be respected.

Of course, that doesn’t mean you should pay your fair share for bringing that sacred life into the world, especially if you can get your child support judgment lowered by not declaring $100,000 of your annual income. I guess Dr. Dan thinks that court-ordered child support is another entitlement program that ought to be done away with.

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Ho', Ho', Ho'!

This just came in Mrs. JP's inbox, which she then passed onto me. How the fuck she got on their radar screen is beyond me but in cases like this the usual suspects are right wing Red State relatives who mean well.

Considering other peoples' experiences with Sarah Palin at other events such as her book signings, I can tell you exactly what you'll get for your $950 (which, since last March, is a real bargain and an even bigger bargain considering what it cost to have your picture taken next to her cardboard cutout two years ago, proving that Palin's depreciating in value faster than a 15 year-old Toyota with bad brakes and a leaky training):



From: Peter Terpeluk, Chairman, RNC Victory 2010
To: signgrrl56@comcast.net
Subject: Sarah Palin Wants to Meet You
Dear ,

Sarah Palin wants to meet you.

You are invited to join Sarah Palin and our conservative candidates running at all levels at a rally to kickoff our Party's final push to victory in Anaheim, CA, on Saturday, October 16th or Orlando, FL, on Saturday, October 23rd.

As a grassroots activist, I hope you will be able to attend one of these special campaign events because you understand more than most exactly what is at stake for our country just 32 days from now.

We must elect commonsense, Reagan-Republican majorities to the U.S. House and Senate and add to the number of Governors if we are to slam the brakes on the Obama Democrats' destructive socialist schemes. Your participation at the victory rally and your continuing generous financial support is vital if we are to pull our candidates across the finish line.

, tickets to these events are only $20.10 for general admission or $90 for the reserved section -- but space is limited and tickets are going fast. (Children under 15 are free.)

You also have the unique opportunity to attend a special reception with Sarah Palin at either location for a gift of $950.

Benefits for those who are able to attend this reception with the Governor include a photo and the unique opportunity to discuss the critical issues facing our country with other grassroots leaders.

To reserve your tickets today, simply go here. After you place your ticket order, you will receive a separate email to print your tickets.

If you can't make it to either of these events, I hope you will take this opportunity to keep our Party moving forward to an historic victory by making an investment of 25 cents for every one of the 435 House, 37 Senate and 37 Governors' races for a total of $127.25. Your gift will ensure that RNC Victory's vital get-out-the-vote effort is fully funded and that our Republican candidates have the down-to-the-wire support they need to win.

Sarah Palin looks forward to meeting you at one of these great events. Working together, I know we will win the battle to save our country.

Sincerely,


Chairman, RNC Victory 2010

P.S. , I hope you can make it to Anaheim, CA, on Saturday, October 16th or Orlando, FL, on Saturday, October 23rd for these exciting RNC Victory 2010 campaign events. Tickets are available for $20.10 apiece for general admission, $90 for the reserved section and $950 for a special reception and photo op. You can get yours right now by going here. Even if you cannot attend, please take this opportunity to make a campaign gift of 25 cents for every major race being contested this fall for a total of $127.25. Thank you.

P.P.S. With your minimum gift of $127.25, you will receive a commemorative copy of Sarah Palin's new book, America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag.


It's gonna be something like this, if history is any indicator:

You'll stand on a long line of people, so many innocent, impressionable Ralphies dreaming of shooting wolves from helicopters with the governor. Hopefully, you'll get to the head of the line before Sarah Barracuda's red-shod feet start getting sore or before her bendy-strawed bottle runs out of water. You'll be picked up and turned around like a widget on an assembly line by her Republican elves, you won't be permitted to talk to her or ask her questions and you'll then be kicked down the big red plastic chute.


You'll stop your humiliating descent, painfully climb back up, and say,

"No! No, Governor! I want an Official Red Ryder Carbine-Action Two-Hundred-Shot Range Model Air Rifle and shoot wolves from helicopters with you!"

She'll imperiously look down at you and say,

"You'll shoot your eye out, kid! Vote Tea Party next month." Then she'll kick you in the face with her red-shod foot and you'll continue your humiliating slide into obscurity as you'll have to hear her say, "Ho, ho, ho, ya betcha!" above you.

That's what you'll get for your $950, kiddies. So, I think Mrs. JP and I will pass.

Friday, October 1, 2010

#84


Because you know you want it, baby. So stayed tuned sometime this weekend for a very special, midterm election edition of Assclowns of the Week. My readers have been generous of late and you guys deserve no less. So, if posting is light between now and then, please be patient. The upcoming ACOTW will be very well worth the wait. Featured will be the usual suspects but if anyone has any suggestions for inclusion or at least a dishonorable mention, now's the time for suggestions.

See ya in the funny pages...